Whodunnit

drulzelot

drulzelot

New member
This is the case of the mysterious missing stuffie.
We need to determine what happened, who did what, and what happened to the corpse.

Exhibit A:



The suspects:

Himself

Pleads: Not guilty
Defense: "I am in the kitchen. The innards are in the parlor. In order for me to have taken any part in this, I would have had to move. Not bloody likely."


Kee, aka, The Sk8R Chik

Pleads: Cookie! Is there a cookie, where's the cookie? Coookiecookiecookie!
Defense: I love you Mommy, I love you love you love you!


Wet

Pleads: Oh puh-lease.
Defense: "It's not a murder if there's no body. When you find a body, then come bother me. That's all I'm sayin'. "


So, jury, what is the verdict?
 
Subbie

Subbie

New member
Seeing I already have my rubber gloves on and my tools out, anybody need any probing to solve this?

I personally think it was the cat.
 
Leonard and his bud Snuffles

Leonard and his bud Snuffles

Active member
R Taft said:
:lol: :lol: :lol:

It cannot be the newf's......never the newf's
Click to expand...
What Ronnie said is so true here. I want to take it one step further based on past case history in the kangaroo courts of new.net. The pet is NEVER guilty. But the owners, well you now they should be hung. In this case, I guess since you were NOT supervising the toy, the direct cause of the muder is your neglect. Pets not guilty. Case closed! I will let YOU decide your own sentence.
 
Last edited:
Thule's Mom

Thule's Mom

New member
Merlin and Maggie chiming in here.... it was the dog... both dogs... NEVER, NEVER the cat! Really, what self-respecting cat would TOUCH a slobbery dog relic!
 
Murphy

Murphy

New member
Leonard and his bud said:
What Ronnie said is so true here. I want to take it one step further based on past case history in the kangaroo courts of new.net. The pet is NEVER guilty. But the ownwrs, well you now they should be hung. In this case, I guess since you were NOT supervising the toy, the direct cause of the muder is your neglect. Pets not guilty. Case closed! I will let YOU decide your own sentence.
Click to expand...
Leonard.. have you been talking to NN Nana or just studying her "teachings" ?? :roflmao:
 
padkins

padkins

New member
Leonard and his bud said:
What Ronnie said is so true here. I want to take it one step further based on past case history in the kangaroo courts of new.net. The pet is NEVER guilty. But the ownwrs, well you now they should be hung. In this case, I guess since you were NOT supervising the toy, the direct cause of the muder is your neglect. Pets not guilty. Case closed! I will let YOU decide your own sentence.
Click to expand...
:roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao:
 
noblenewf

noblenewf

New member
I LOVE their defense lines...priceless!
We will have to investigate this further. Do we know when this murder took place? Where were each of the suspects on that date and at that time? Do they have witnesses that can verify their whereabouts? :D
 
SheilaT

SheilaT

New member
Leonard, Leonard, Leonard. It's no use trying to buck the NN legal system. All judgements are final and are always in the favor of the Newf. Skye has now eaten 12 remote controls and exactly NONE of that was her fault. She has an addiction and addiction is a disease. The two legged's in the house are prosecuted for enabling her addiction. Daughter tried to blame poor puppy for eating her $100 pair of Coach Flip-flops. Who the heck leaves a $100 pair of FLIP-FLOPS where a remote control/sandal eating Newf can get to them?
 
SheilaT

SheilaT

New member
Personally, Queenie.....I think the Newfs foiled a black market squeeker transplant ring. The body of the poor stuffy was probably put into the dry ice cooler mistakenly by the stuffy killers as they were out-foxed by the Newfs. The illegally removed sqeeker was forgotten in their haste to depart the premises. The cat looks awfully comfy there and is probably the orchestrator of the whole black market operation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top