Are all breeders on nca reputable???

Just out of curiousity, in the German lines are all GSD's required to be XRAY'd before a litter can be registerred, or is the 7% the number of GSD's that show as having hip dysplasia in their hip registry? (Not sure if I asked that clearly....just got off work and drove home on bad roads...a snowstorm coming in) It seems like I remember hearing about a few breeds here in the US that arent recognized by AKC, but their parent clubs hold the registry, and they require any dogs being registerred to come from cleared parents.
 
Very interesting article. Those stats certainly are impressive. One thing that always concerns me about things like this is that it is a correlation, with nothing to validate that the correlation between the two is actually correct. One thing that is noticeable immediately is that the German dogs lack the extreme angulation seen in the modern German Sheperd in the US, which could actually be part of why the German dogs have less hip dysplasia. I would be elated if we could reduce the incidence of hip dysplasia in Newfs to below 10% simply by using only cleared parents, but I suspect it isnt quite that simple. Every study I have ever seen on hip dysplasia seems to show it is a combination of genetics, environment and nutrition, and some studies put as much emphasis on environment as they do on genetics. I think something else that needs to be studied is why breeds such as Borzoi's have what appears to be an extremely low rate of hip dysplasia...maybe there is something else there besides the fact that they are built very lean and light.Thanks for the artile info....it is really interesting.
 

Kay

New member
Very interesting article. Those stats certainly are impressive. One thing that always concerns me about things like this is that it is a correlation, with nothing to validate that the correlation between the two is actually correct.
The correlation is likely correct, but correlation does not equal causation. A popular example: high incidence of obesity is correlated to high TV watching. The conclusion: TV makes people fat! Wrong - we cannot conclude this, only that there is a relationship between the two. (In this example, it's possible that less activity leads to obesity, and those who are less active watch more TV.) :)
 

kellycane

New member
As far as health requirements go, there are many breed clubs that specify that to be on their breeders list, you must do health clearances. In fact, there are some that even state all dogs used for breeding must have passed their clearances, not just that they have been done (which incidentally, I dont necessarily agree with).
Just out of curiosity, why would you want to breed a dog that has NOT passed his/her health clearances? I only have limited college background in biology, and I know genetics is complicated, with a lot of variables. But generally, isn't it in the best interest of the future health of the breed to only breed the healthiest dogs?
 

sarnewfie

New member
It is NOT all about health clearances. It is about a functioning unsymptomatic dog. And, really do the clubs really watch breeders that close? Just curious. ( and i am talking hips here not cystinuria)
I find that many times within reason, a balanced functioning working dog without symptoms that does not pass ofa on hips is not to be thrown out of the breeding pool ( at 3 to 4 years you will know if they are). The gene pool is not that big. And with popular stud crazes going on, i would rather go with a pedigree that has a bit more variety than a tightly bred one that everyone and their brother has that stud dog listed 3 times in that pedigree. That is just me. I guess i am rambling now.

#####################
Every study I have ever seen on hip dysplasia seems to show it is a combination of genetics, environment and nutrition, and some studies put as much emphasis on environment as they do on genetics.
########################################
YES I AGREE!~
That is why i have a WARRANTY not a gaurantee!
 
Last edited:

Windancer

New member
I raised 'German' (import) sheps at one time...The difference is that we don't have the gene pool in newfies that is available in GSD's....to add....I detest the American over angled variety...I think it is disgusting what they have done to that working breed. And fine bone.... ugg
 

YorkvilleNewfie

New member
I raised 'German' (import) sheps at one time...The difference is that we don't have the gene pool in newfies that is available in GSD's....to add....I detest the American over angled variety...I think it is disgusting what they have done to that working breed. And fine bone.... ugg
I agree with you 100%. It's absolutely abhorrent.
American breeders are currently ruining my two favorite breeds of working horse, the Clydesdale and the Friesian. They're being given finer bone while making them taller, and taller, and taller. Believe you me, the results of this will be just as deleterious to those masterpieces of selective breeding as this type of breeding did to the GSD.
 

sarnewfie

New member
I was raised with GSD and i cannot believe how crippled up they are just to do a simple walk, the rear legs are all over the place. All in the name of a floating gait? The roached back and pasterns that some are crippled on by age 2 is very sad not to mention the narrow heads. UGGGGGG
I feel for the horses!
 

sendchocolate

New member
I find this conversation fascinating, and don't feel I know enough about genetics to contribute to the breeding aspect, but I wanted to mention why I went with the NCA list, personally.

There are A LOT of newfoundland breeders out on the web. Sites galore, and all of their dogs look healthy, and happy. Maybe they are. But I wanted at least a breeder who cared about the breed, bred for conformation, did the health clearances, within reason, and had good standing in newfoundland circles. To this end, the NCA list was a great help. I knew that the breeder/puppy family relationship is a long one, and wanted to a good repoire with my breeder.

As a consumer, prospective buyer, it is really easy to find a puppy, even the color and sex that I want. They are all over the puppy lists, tons of them, ripe for the picking! But who ARE those breeders? Are they puppy millers? I would have no idea. I also don't think that puppy mill breeders are above stretching the truth about who they are, and what they sell. I think ethics are sadly lacking, and to me, the proof of that is the fact they they are puppy millers in the first place! And then there are the BYB. I contacted a really, really nice woman in my state. She breeds a "dry-mouthed" newf, and again, her website was wonderful. Her family seemed great, the dogs, happy. But this was her FIRST litter, no health clearances at all... and I just was not willing to go down that road. More importantly, if she was selecting for dry mouth, what was she selecting against? So, just, no.

Sorry, getting longwinded. My point is just that the NCA list gave me a starting point. I had to do the legwork after that...but at least I didn't have to narrow down thousands of useless websites. Trying to get in touch with my local newf club has been a herculean effort...and I just don't think they would have been very helpful in my search. Thank goodness for the NCA list.
 

jacqueline

New member
i have found this thread fasinating and confusing, but excellent for me . i am currently researching breeders , as i hope to add to the family in the future . as i live in spain , i started there , wow , just wow ,i have found nothing so far that i feel confident in , i must admit to looking at all of the breeders on NN first , so that i had an idea of what to look for , there is not one that even comes close to any of you , so i am going to start researching in the uk . i did look at the breeder of my newfs sire , its so big , so many puppys for sale , world wide delivery etc etc . i would of course go to my boys breeder , but they are not planning to breed any longer , they only bred 4 litters , as now the two ladies are almost 10 , and 7 , they dont feel adding another is what they want , they reccomended the breeder of my boys sire , but i would not feel good about a puppy from there. so i will continue my search , i was wondering if i am allowed to post the names of any dams and sires in this section ,
jacqui,x
 

BLCOLE

Active member
I agree that the NCA list is a good STARTING POINT when finding a breeder. I would like to point out, however, that just because there is a list does not make all of the breeders on the list "equal."

I will give a personal anecdote. I recently took as a rehome a spayed female from a well known breeder who is on the NCA breeder's list. The dog has her championship.

The female in question, as mentioned, has her championship. The female in question has given birth to OTHER Newfs who have gone on to become Champions. The female's last litter consisted of ONE puppy that had some profound problems (the puppy DIED at 4 1/2 weeks). The breeder in question had the female SPAYED rather than breed her again.

I was very impressed by this and I personally feel that it reflects well on the breeder that she would spay the female under these circumstances instead of running the risk of future problems.

...And her decision had a happy ending. I have a new, WONDERFUL dog. ...And whatever problem caused the unfortunate problem will not be passed on to other Newfs from the breeder's doing.

Just my opinion, for whatever it is worth...

PS. I also know breeders who are NOT on the list that I would not hesitate recommending to someone looking for a Newf. I have done this in the past
 
Last edited:

KCoppenrath

New member
I agree that the NCA list is a good STARTING POINT when finding a breeder. I would like to point out, however, that just because there is a list does not make all of the breeders on the list "equal."
I agree here... I would add that I wouldn't overlook you local club's breeder list either. There are a lot of GREAT local breeders who don't carry or want a national reputation.

What you do want is a breeder that is part of the greater newf and dog community... They need to be aware of what's happening, see the other dogs being bred, learn from other breeders/competitors, have relationships that allow them to breed outside their home/kennel in a smart way. That's why AKC/NCA titles matter in choosing a breeder. It's not the intrinsic value of the titles that's important, its what it represents in the experience of getting them.

To plug local clubs.... being a member of your local newf club and getting to know the breeders in your area definitely makes choosing one easier.

Sincerely,
Kimberly Coppenrath
NCNE Rescue Co-chair
toll-free: 888-831-4873
email: rescue@newfclubne.org

PS -- I think the ease of AI has lead to some problems in "stud dog craze". I think we would have better breedings if the owners of stud dogs had more invested than fedexing a few straws and cashing a check.
 

Ocean's Edge

New member
Truly a fascinating thread, and a real can o'worms.

I see a lot of the different angles in this conversation. My grandmother was a very fine breeder of GSD and collies back in the early 50's (Elm City out of Fredricton NB). Her line was, if I do say so myself, one of the finest all round dogs - temperment, intelligence, health and look. As such for decades my sister suffered great heartache in her love for the GSD breed - a number of dogs in the last 35 years with excellent pedigrees and conformations and horrible health complications. About 5 yrs ago her mentality did a shift and she quit looking at a dog's (or parents') conformation championships and started focusing on working dogs her young Nadja has had much success on the working field and was bred to a fine young man chosen especially for his temperment and working style and titles. The litter is now two weeks old. I couldn't be happier for her it's taken her 35 yrs of work to get to those 8 little fuzz balls.

Like my sisters (I have another who breeds Corgis), I had a long standing interest in breeding. First with my Saint 25 yrs ago, she had health problems (flea allergies and skin problems) and a breeder who wasn't all that terribly helpful in mentoring me as a neophyte. Then I started my research and looking for a Newf. I was in the process of looking for a breeder when Buddy came into my life. Buddy? He's a stunning looking Newf, with a really nice temperment. But of course Buddy will never be shown or bred because he's a (sorta) rescue, with no papers, and no pedigree to breed him would be irresponsible. No matter how extraordinary an example of the breed he may be, no matter how many health clearances, no matter how many DNA tests I had done - it just can't be done. And as Buddy came to us from a BYB, local folks only ask 'where'd ya get him?' and don't really ask any father than that about the circumstances - so I suspect they already think I'm a irresponsible owner (of course - I could just be painfully shy and a bit paranoid and feeling a bit insecure self esteme issues - any of you other rescue owners sometimes feel a bit out of water when hanging out with groups of 'purebred' owners and breeders?)

Here's the thing: a) I've spent a lotta work over the years with all sorts of animal rescue groups, and a responsible breeding or not - there's still that touch of guilt about bringing another litter of puppies into the world and then b) everything one reads says to be a responsible breeder you show your dogs - to show your committment to improving the breed to the breed standard. But as has been talked about here showing doesn't say anything about a dog's health, and only about their temperment in the ring. Now a good breeder is going to do those health clearances, and is breeding for temperment as well and those are the things you're going to be looking for in your breeder and in your dog.

For me, I'm not particularly interested in showing. A good looking dog is nice, but the standards change (see the GSD), and vary so much from country to country - US Canadian and European standards are so different. You breed and show a brown Newf in Canada - well you couldn't (you'd also be viewed with a lot of hositlity as irresponsible), but in Europe you could be a champion. Frankly, I'm kinda of the opinion that it's this focus on showing that has IMO led to a systemic bias of breeding for look that has hurt so many breeds. (not that puppy mills and byb's don't also have to shoulder their own share of the blame).

As for me, I'm just not into the whole club/showing politics and focus - that's just not my thing. I'd love to get Buddy involved with a working (carting especially) club, but my inquiries locally haven't turned up much in the way of working clubs. Even if we found a club, even if Buddy won a fistful of working titles - without the registration papers he could never be bred.

Ya I understand why it has to be that way. I understand the problems. Popular breeds, BYB's, Puppy Mills, Pet Stores - the system is the only way we have of trying to push back against those problems. I just wish like others that there was at least some consideration for health issues as well as look.

I'd love a beautiful litter of fuzzy black trouble makers (named after vaccuums - Kirby, Hoover, Dyson, Bissell, ... *snicker*), and every so often I get bit again with the 'puppy fever' bug, but without showing and titles it wouldn't matter how much OTHER work and selection and guarentees I did I'd still just be another BYB. That's just not something I'm willing to do. So ... no puppies for me.

This has all been a round about way of agreeing with most of what's already been said in this thread. In the end for me finding a responsible breeder isn't about titles, or club memberships, or organizations (although that can be a good place to start). It's about someone caring and committed, someone you can work with and you feel will be there for you, who's done the background work,
 

NewfieMama

New member
I agree that the NCA list is a good STARTING POINT when finding a breeder. I would like to point out, however, that just because there is a list does not make all of the breeders on the list "equal."

I will give a personal anecdote. I recently took as a rehome a spayed female from a well known breeder who is on the NCA breeder's list. The dog has her championship.

The female in question, as mentioned, has her championship. The female in question has given birth to OTHER Newfs who have gone on to become Champions. The female's last litter consisted of ONE puppy that had some profound problems (the puppy DIED at 4 1/2 weeks). The breeder in question had the female SPAYED rather than breed her again.

I was very impressed by this and I personally feel that it reflects well on the breeder that she would spay the female under these circumstances instead of running the risk of future problems.

...And her decision had a happy ending. I have a new, WONDERFUL dog. ...And whatever problem caused the unfortunate problem will not be passed on to other Newfs from the breeder's doing.

Just my opinion, for whatever it is worth...

PS. I also know breeders who are NOT on the list that I would not hesitate recommending to someone looking for a Newf. I have done this in the past
Brad, congratulations on your new arrival! When do we see pics???
 

BLCOLE

Active member
Brad, congratulations on your new arrival! When do we see pics???
We'll get pictures up as soon as I get some pictures developed and scanned.

I am still in the dark ages and haven't gone digital yet. I started "collecting" Olympus 35MM stuff in high school, 30 years ago. I can't bear getting rid of 3 camera bodies, 8 or 9 lenses, and a motor drive...

BTW, thanks for the congrats. She's a sweet girl...
 
Top