pabusinesswoman
New member
In a few other posts, there were discussions of newf size and life span of the newf. My wheels have been turning.
I have been considering a Landseer pup in a year or so and have pretty well narrowed down the breeder.
Though health and longevity is 1st priority, I have often wondered what would happen if I purchased a male pup and he grows quite large. I had a chow that lived to 11 years, but had ortho issues all of her life. Thus, I have been very concerned about the ortho issues in the larger breed and try to educate myself as much as possible. Beautiful as some of the larger dogs are, I have always heard bigger is not necessarily better.
I never really considered the size issue with my female, since I have never seen an 180lb, female. Mosty lines I had researched at had both the bitches and the dog in the range of the standard.
Thus for the benefit of gaining knowlege/ educating myself, I thought I would ask a few questions.
In the above stated posts, the priorities of the breedings were health, structure, and gait first (adhearing to the AKC standard). Size was a last priority. They were just big dogs.
I am assuming several of these factors have been taken into consideration when writing the standard. Thus, why the range for the standard states the upper end of the average at 150 lbs.
For the sake of consistency, I am refering to a larger newf as those above the upper end of the standard.. IE. 150 lbs+; particular interest in those around 180 lbs. and it is a solid heathy dog.. not a butter ball. What does that extra 30 lbs do in the big scheme of things?
I'm getting long winded, so here are my questions:
Size vs. Longevity
Is there statistical data comparing size of a newf vs longevity. IE. How long a 110 lb dog would live comparing to an 180 lb. newf?
If so, is there a threshold where longevity decreases, and what factors to you think attribute to that? (Ex. if the threashold was 9 years for larger newfs vs 13 years for smaller and the larger size causes more stress on cardio etc)
Sex vs. Longevity
Would the sex of a larger newf affect longevity? IE. Has anyone seen that female larger newfs live longer than males?
Size vs. Amount of Ortho. Issues/ Ages Ortho. Issues arise
Many larger newfs I have met have ortho issues. I know there are some out there that have had healthy lives at larger sizes. Is there statistical data that correlates size with ortho issues? IE.. Is there a particular size in which ortho issues seem to increase?
Are the answers to these questions as a general rule? Or, would the answers vary per lines?
Thanks for taking the time to look at my inquiry. Your input is appriciated.
I have been considering a Landseer pup in a year or so and have pretty well narrowed down the breeder.
Though health and longevity is 1st priority, I have often wondered what would happen if I purchased a male pup and he grows quite large. I had a chow that lived to 11 years, but had ortho issues all of her life. Thus, I have been very concerned about the ortho issues in the larger breed and try to educate myself as much as possible. Beautiful as some of the larger dogs are, I have always heard bigger is not necessarily better.
I never really considered the size issue with my female, since I have never seen an 180lb, female. Mosty lines I had researched at had both the bitches and the dog in the range of the standard.
Thus for the benefit of gaining knowlege/ educating myself, I thought I would ask a few questions.
In the above stated posts, the priorities of the breedings were health, structure, and gait first (adhearing to the AKC standard). Size was a last priority. They were just big dogs.
I am assuming several of these factors have been taken into consideration when writing the standard. Thus, why the range for the standard states the upper end of the average at 150 lbs.
For the sake of consistency, I am refering to a larger newf as those above the upper end of the standard.. IE. 150 lbs+; particular interest in those around 180 lbs. and it is a solid heathy dog.. not a butter ball. What does that extra 30 lbs do in the big scheme of things?
I'm getting long winded, so here are my questions:
Size vs. Longevity
Is there statistical data comparing size of a newf vs longevity. IE. How long a 110 lb dog would live comparing to an 180 lb. newf?
If so, is there a threshold where longevity decreases, and what factors to you think attribute to that? (Ex. if the threashold was 9 years for larger newfs vs 13 years for smaller and the larger size causes more stress on cardio etc)
Sex vs. Longevity
Would the sex of a larger newf affect longevity? IE. Has anyone seen that female larger newfs live longer than males?
Size vs. Amount of Ortho. Issues/ Ages Ortho. Issues arise
Many larger newfs I have met have ortho issues. I know there are some out there that have had healthy lives at larger sizes. Is there statistical data that correlates size with ortho issues? IE.. Is there a particular size in which ortho issues seem to increase?
Are the answers to these questions as a general rule? Or, would the answers vary per lines?
Thanks for taking the time to look at my inquiry. Your input is appriciated.
Last edited: