Chad
Inactive Member
Its christmas time and for those of you who are thinking of getting a puppy you might wabt to follow this thread. I have noticed many people make referrences to good breeders and they also make referrences about bad breeders. I am just curious why people make such broad and general comments. So how about some honost comments on what truely makes a good breeder. In my opinion a good breeder is someone who cares about the breed and is willing to accept any dog back for any reason. And in some cases give full refunds! Someone who trys to breed for a specific purpose such as making the breed better. Someone that truely cares about the breed and does all of the proper tests before breeding there dogs (just because you can breed a dog at a year old doesnt mean you should) Also breeders that advertise CH in front of names doesnt mean you are getting a CH, if breeders were honost they would tell you they are lucky if they get 1 CH out of a litter. Nobody can guarantee you will get a Show puppy.
Contracts aren't a bad thing but
like any contract it should protect all parties breed,breeder,and buyer. Ask about getting the pick of the litter, make sure the breeder posts pictures on a weekly basis. Make sure all of the sire and dams documents on health issues are included in your paperwork. You should also have the breeder explain the difference between full and partial registration.
(bad breeders) What makes a bad breeder hummmmmmmmmmmm in my opinion a bad breeder is anyone who (1.)doesn't test there dogs and breeds them before they are ready. (2.) 8 out of 10 litters don't produce atleast akc standard pups.
(3.) someone who doesnt care what kind of homes there dogs go to (4.) someone who doesnt inform people of the cost and responsibility a large breed dog will cost. (5.)not explaining that a cute puppy will be a big drooly doggie.
(remember) just because someone is a first time breeder doesnt mean you shouldnt buy from them, people talk about breeders having thirteen dogs (so what!)that doesnt make them a puppy mill. If people advertise on the internet all over the place that doesnt make them a bad breeder either.
If reputable breeders try and tell you they don't make money then scratch your head and do the math
8 or 10 times $1500 dollars!
Now money is certainly not a reason to breed but if you are planning on breeding then I recommend you find a mentor. Someone who has been breeding a long time to help. Now I am sure I haven't covered all the pro's and con's and everyones opinion is welcomed
Contracts aren't a bad thing but
like any contract it should protect all parties breed,breeder,and buyer. Ask about getting the pick of the litter, make sure the breeder posts pictures on a weekly basis. Make sure all of the sire and dams documents on health issues are included in your paperwork. You should also have the breeder explain the difference between full and partial registration.
(bad breeders) What makes a bad breeder hummmmmmmmmmmm in my opinion a bad breeder is anyone who (1.)doesn't test there dogs and breeds them before they are ready. (2.) 8 out of 10 litters don't produce atleast akc standard pups.
(3.) someone who doesnt care what kind of homes there dogs go to (4.) someone who doesnt inform people of the cost and responsibility a large breed dog will cost. (5.)not explaining that a cute puppy will be a big drooly doggie.
(remember) just because someone is a first time breeder doesnt mean you shouldnt buy from them, people talk about breeders having thirteen dogs (so what!)that doesnt make them a puppy mill. If people advertise on the internet all over the place that doesnt make them a bad breeder either.
If reputable breeders try and tell you they don't make money then scratch your head and do the math
8 or 10 times $1500 dollars!